David Stern Sanctions On San Antonio: Justified Or Too Much?

Soon after Gregg Popovich announced he’d be resting his team’s stars for tonight’s game against Miami and sending them home on an airplane to prepare for San Antonio’s next contest, David Stern said the Spurs would be facing “substantial sanctions” for these actions. Tony Parker, Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili and Danny Green were all sent home early and given a day to rest for a primetime game against Miami which was televised nationally on TNT. And since Kawhi Leonard and Stephen Jackson are both currently injured, that meant San Antonio was playing without its best six players. Stern apologized to NBA fans, saying this decision was “unacceptable.” In his statement, it seemed that Stern was apologizing for a lack of competitive spirit in what should have been a matchup between two of the league’s best teams.

Let’s be clear, though. David Stern doesn’t give a damn about how competitive a game is between two contenders in November. What he does give a damn about, though, is how competitive a game is between two contenders on national television. Had this game not been televised, these kind of sanctions might not be happening. However, considering how often Popovich rests his starters and the fact that this would have been a great primetime matchup (and possible NBA Finals preview), it’s no wonder Stern is taking action.

Whether or not you agree with Popovich’s right to rest his starters or David Stern’s financial motivations is irrelevant. The fact is, Stern is probably in the right here. No matter what his motivation is, there are plenty of reasons why Pop can’t be pulling this kind of stuff in November. It doesn’t matter that the Spurs’ second string made it a game; what matters is TNT probably didn’t pull in the ratings it would have if Duncan, Ginobili and Parker had been on the floor. And since this game lost a lot of its luster with the news that the Spurs’ starters wouldn’t be taking the floor, a lot of people missed out on a good game. And in a league centered on competition and primetime matchups, sitting stars is frowned upon, but sending them home before the game to prepare for the next one? That’s just unacceptable.

Popovich is a terrific coach. But his decision to rest starters so often is not good for the league.

Can you imagine a league where stars are consistently given the night off and aren’t even in the arena when their teammates are playing? That’s a league nobody would take seriously. These guys are paid millions of dollars a year to play a game. People pay a lot of money to see their favorite players live. If they’re old and aching, that’s fine. But there’s no excuse for these guys to be treated like prima donnas and not even show up to the game. And that’s the kind of precedent that would be established if Pop were allowed to continue to rest his starters like this.

Popovich is a tremendous coach and clearly knows how to manage his players in preparation for the postseason; his coaching San Antonio’s reserves to a near victory over the defending champions on the road is proof of that. But every team has older guys on their roster. You can complain all you want about Stern’s hypocrisy in allowing teams to tank for draft picks but coming down hard on this kind of stuff, but the fact is, there’s a reason the NBA’s profits have increased exponentially during his tenure as commissioner. The man knows how to turn a profit and whether you’re a businessman or not, resting starters as consistently as Pop does is not good for the NBA from a financial perspective. And no matter what Stern’s motivation is, as basketball fans, shouldn’t we be siding with him anyway? Yeah it’s hard to argue with Pop’s coaching decisions considering his immense success in the league, but how can we call ourselves true fans of the sport if we don’t support actions to enforce better competition? You can’t tell me Spurs fans were excited to hear their favorite players wouldn’t be suiting up (or even in the arena) for a nationally televised game against another title contender, regardless of whether or not the game turned out to be a good one. Because even if fans do see the benefit of resting the older guys, that kind of constant disappointment for Spurs fans (and anyone who enjoys watching good basketball games) needs to be put to an end. It’s only one game and Stern may be motivated by financial reasons, but we should be united with him in a demand for the spirit of competition to shine through.

You can dislike him all you want, but David Stern is right. Resting starters is not good for the NBA.

4 thoughts on “David Stern Sanctions On San Antonio: Justified Or Too Much?

  1. You’ve listed so many valid reasons in the book already as to why David Stern should back the hell off, yet you’re still siding with Stern on this issue despite the fact that the best you can drum up in his defense was better said on a TNA Wrestling Impact episode in 2009 when Kevin Nash explained to Sting his decision to support Kurt Angle’s plans for their Main Event Mafia faction by screaming out, “THIS IS ABOUT MONEY!”

    If a homunculus came to you and offered you a million dollars to serve Satan…

    • If you’re citing wrestling you automatically lose credit, but if you read the article all the way through, you’ll note that that’s not the only reason I cite. This is about the competitive nature of the sport and the league and regardless of Stern’s motives, he is right in the fact that resting starters hurts the NBA (not only from a financial standpoint but from a credibility standpoint as well). Comparing Stern’s motives to Satan’s is hardly relevant or credible and to be honest, I listed many more reasons Stern SHOULD enforce sanctions than “back the hell off.” Read thoroughly next time before writing hasty comments, please.

  2. You can’t disregard the fact that it turned out to be a GREAT game. People need to stop underestimating us, it’s annoying. The only argument you and Stern have is about the money. Did you not compare how much the Spurs have played in the past week versus Miami?
    We do not deserve to be punished in anyway. Pop’s job isn’t to be concerned about ratings, it’s to get the Spurs to the Finals.

    I don’t know about you, but I felt the “spirit of competition” all the way here in Texas, and they were in Florida.

    • That’s fine, I watched the entire game and I too felt the competition. But I’m a loyal NBA fan and you are clearly a loyal Spurs fan. That doesn’t speak for the rest of the country that was expecting a primetime matchup. Just because you and I watched it and enjoyed a good game doesn’t mean the rest of the country did. No matter what your stance on the issue is, it’s impossible to deny that TNT would have gotten better ratings had the starters played. And if you believe that Pop’s job was to get the Spurs to the Finals, why would he play his starters against bad teams like the Magic, Wizards and Raptors and NOT a quality team like Miami? If he really wanted to rack up the wins and exhibit that “spirit of competition,” he could have easily rested his starters against one of those lackluster teams and not against a title contender that was nationally televised.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s